"In saying that nothing in today's opinion casts doubt on non-abortion precedents, Justice Thomas explains, he means only that they are not at issue in this very case," the liberals continued. "The first problem with the majority's account comes from Justice Thomas's concurrence - which makes clear he is not with the program," the dissent said. "We cannot understand how anyone can be confident that today's opinion will be the last of its kind," wrote the liberals, justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, In a furious dissent to Friday's ruling, the Supreme Court's three liberal justices pointed to Thomas' concurring opinion as one of several dangers to individuals' rights that flowed from the decision. we have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents," Thomas added. "Because any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous'. in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." While Thomas said that he agreed that nothing in the Roe-related ruling Friday "should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. Thomas said the idea that the constitutional clause that guarantees only "process" for depriving a person of life, liberty or property cannot be used "to define the substance of those rights." That is the tack conservative lawmakers took in multiple states, where for years they passed restrictive abortion laws in the hopes that a challenge to them would reach the Supreme Court and open the door for federal abortion rights to be overturned as a result.
Thomas' recommendation to reconsider that trio of decisions does not have the force of legal precedent, nor does it compel his colleagues on the Supreme Court to take the action he suggested.īut it is an implicit invitation to conservative lawmakers in individual states to pass legislation that might run afoul of the Supreme Court's past decisions, with an eye toward having that court potentially reverse those rulings. Hodges, which said there is a right to same-sex marriage. Texas, which in 2003 established the right to engage in private sexual acts and the 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Connecticut, the 1965 ruling in which the Supreme Court said married couples have the right to obtain contraceptives Lawrence v. No arrests had been made by Thursday night, CBS 13 said.The cases he mentioned are Griswold vs. However, she appears to have changed her mind and filed a report the following day, the site said. The slur-slinging woman was treated by medical workers on the scene for minor injuries, initially telling officers that she did not want to press charges for the fight she accepted was partially her fault, Sacramento Sheriff’s Department told TMZ.
#White on black gay videos update#
She then posted a video update Thursday to insist that she had not been arrested, dispelling online rumors that she was “incarcerated,” CBS 13 said. “B-h! I’m the right one!” the puncher said as she left the store, encouraging the cashier to call 911. The black woman immediately started punching her adversary, hitting her head several times before the woman ended up on the floor, sobbing. “B-h, I’m the right one, try it!” she screamed at the white woman, warning she would “beat your motherf–king ass in this motherf–king store.”Īfter a final challenge to say “n-r again,” the white woman pauses - just to unexpectedly spit out the racist slur. It is not clear what sparked the fight but t he unidentified black woman flies into a rage when the white woman uses the N-word, repeatedly screaming back, “Call me a n-r again!”
Viral video of the so-called “Sacramento Karen” showdown begins with the pair screaming at each other from inside the convenience store Monday. The story behind Juneteenth, one of America's oldest holidaysĪ black woman battered an elderly white shopper in a California 7-Eleven in a violent confrontation caught on camera after the white woman used a racial slur. Woman held in anti-Asian pepper-spray attack deserves legal 'crackdown', activists say Allstate, Progressive drop insurance company over 'racist' Juneteenth sign